Predicted Trait | |
Reported Trait | Triple negative breast cancer versus luminal breast cancer |
Mapped Trait(s) | triple-negative breast cancer (EFO_0005537) |
Additional Trait Information | Luminal breast cancer includes luminal A, luminal B and luminal B-Her2-negative breast cancer |
Score Construction | |
PGS Name | CC-GWAS_PRS |
Development Method | |
Name | Genome-wide significant SNPs and additional ones with suggestive associations |
Parameters | After removal of variants with MAF < 0.01, an imputation quality score r2 of < 0.8, small INDELs, and the C/G or A/T SNPs due to strand ambiguity in the original case-control GWAS,we perfomed CC-GWAS analysis for the comparisons between TNBC, and luminal A-like, luminal B-like, and luminal B/HER2 negative-like breast cancer. Among the SNPs with P<5×10-7 (POLS < 5×10-7) from CC-GWAS, we removed SNPs with P < 5×10-8 in the case-control GWAS of either subtype (as they should be identified as significant variants from original case-control GWAS for subtypes). However, we retained SNPs if their P case-control < 0.01 for subtype I and P case-control < 5×10-8 for subtype II (but not vice versa) to ensure that we would not miss a CC-GWAS signal contributed by both subtypes especially by subtype I. Then, the remaining SNPs were clumped using r2<0.1, and the 1000 Genomes Phase 3 EUR data as the LD reference. |
Variants | |
Original Genome Build | GRCh37 |
Number of Variants | 25 |
Effect Weight Type | beta |
PGS Source | |
PGS Catalog Publication (PGP) ID | PGP000620 |
Citation (link to publication) | Sun X et al. Cancer Res (2024) |
Ancestry Distribution | |
Source of Variant Associations (GWAS) | European: 100% 106,571 individuals (100%) |
PGS Evaluation |
Study Identifiers | Sample Numbers | Sample Ancestry | Cohort(s) |
---|---|---|---|
— | [
|
European | BCAC |
PGS Performance Metric ID (PPM) |
PGS Sample Set ID (PSS) |
Performance Source | Trait |
PGS Effect Sizes (per SD change) |
Classification Metrics | Other Metrics | Covariates Included in the Model |
PGS Performance: Other Relevant Information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPM021270 | PSS011672| Multi-ancestry (including European)| 9,868 individuals |
PGP000620 | Sun X et al. Cancer Res (2024) |
Reported Trait: Triple negative breast cancer compared to luminal-like breast cancer | — | — | Odds ratio (OR, high vs low tertile): 2.62 [1.44, 4.75] | Age at initial pathologic diagnosis of breast cancer, pathologic stage | — |
PGS Sample Set ID (PSS) |
Phenotype Definitions and Methods | Participant Follow-up Time | Sample Numbers | Age of Study Participants | Sample Ancestry | Additional Ancestry Description | Cohort(s) | Additional Sample/Cohort Information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSS011672 | The molecular intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer were determined following the strategy of Giovanni's work using the PAM50 classifier in the TCGA-BRCA. Basal-like and luminal-like breast cancer were determined by PAM50. | — | [
|
— | European | — | TCGA | — |
PSS011672 | Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) was defined as ER negative, PR negative and HER2 negative. The luminal breast cancer was defined as ER and/or PR positive. | — | [
|
— | African American or Afro-Caribbean | — | AABCG | — |