PGS Publication: PGP000181

Publication Information (EuropePMC)
Title Genome-wide survival study identifies a novel synaptic locus and polygenic score for cognitive progression in Parkinson's disease.
PubMed ID 33958783(Europe PMC)
doi 10.1038/s41588-021-00847-6
Publication Date May 6, 2021
Journal Nat Genet
Author(s) Liu G, Peng J, Liao Z, Locascio JJ, Corvol JC, Zhu F, Dong X, Maple-Grødem J, Campbell MC, Elbaz A, ... Lesage S, Brice A, Mangone G, Growdon JH, Hung AY, Schwarzschild MA, Hayes MT, Wills AM, Herrington TM, Ravina B, Shoulson I, Taba P, Kõks S, Beach TG, Cormier-Dequaire F, Alves G, Tysnes OB, Perlmutter JS, Heutink P, Amr SS, van Hilten JJ, Kasten M, Mollenhauer B, Trenkwalder C, Klein C, Barker RA, Williams-Gray CH, Marinus J, International Genetics of Parkinson Disease Progression (IGPP) Consortium, Scherzer CR.Show more
Released in PGS Catalog: May 28, 2021

Associated Polygenic Score(s)

Filter PGS by Participant Ancestry
Individuals included in:
G - Source of Variant Associations (GWAS)
D - Score Development/Training
E - PGS Evaluation
List of ancestries includes:
Display options:
Ancestry legend
Multi-ancestry (including European)
Multi-ancestry (excluding European)
African
East Asian
South Asian
Additional Asian Ancestries
European
Greater Middle Eastern
Hispanic or Latin American
Additional Diverse Ancestries
Not Reported

PGS Developed By This Publication

Loading, please wait
Polygenic Score ID & Name
PGS Publication ID (PGP)
Reported Trait
Mapped Trait(s) (Ontology)
Number of Variants
Ancestry distribution
GWAS
Dev
Eval
Scoring File (FTP Link)
PGS000777
(PHS3_PDD)
PGP000181 |
Liu G et al. Nat Genet (2021)
Parkinson's disease dementiacognitive decline measurement,
Parkinson disease
3
G
D
E
https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/spot/pgs/scores/PGS000777/ScoringFiles/PGS000777.txt.gz
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 rows

Performance Metrics

Disclaimer: The performance metrics are displayed as reported by the source studies. It is important to note that metrics are not necessarily comparable with each other. For example, metrics depend on the sample characteristics (described by the PGS Catalog Sample Set [PSS] ID), phenotyping, and statistical modelling. Please refer to the source publication for additional guidance on performance.

Loading, please wait
PGS Performance
Metric ID (PPM)
Evaluated Score
PGS Sample Set ID
(PSS)
Performance Source
Trait
PGS Effect Sizes
(per SD change)
Classification Metrics
Other Metrics
Covariates Included in the Model
PGS Performance:
Other Relevant Information
PPM002014PGS000777
(PHS3_PDD)
PSS000997|
Multi-ancestry (including European)|
404 individuals
PGP000181 |
Liu G et al. Nat Genet (2021)
Reported Trait: Parkinson's disease dementiaHR: 2.05 [1.16, 3.61]AUROC: 0.688 [0.519, 0.817]Hazard's Ratio (HR, top 25% vs PHS of 0): 3.2 [1.26, 8.11]Age at Parkinson's disease onset, sex, years of education, PCs(1-10), study cohort, genetic factors ... (genes: GBA, APOE ε4)Show more
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 rows

Evaluated Samples

Loading, please wait
PGS Sample Set ID
(PSS)
Phenotype Definitions and Methods
Participant Follow-up Time
Sample Numbers
Age of Study Participants
Sample Ancestry
Additional Ancestry Description
Cohort(s)
Additional Sample/Cohort Information
PSS000997All individuals had Parkinsons' disease. Dementia was defined by the following criteria for each coh... ort. DeNoPa: Dementia was defined using operationalized level 1 MDS dementia criteria. These criteria required 1, an MMSE< 26; 2, cognitive deficits severe enough to impact daily living (MDS-UPDRS sub-score I item 1, Cognitive impairment score ≥ 2 indicating ‘Dementia has impact on active daily living scale’); 3, impairment in at least two cognitive domains operationalized as impairment in two of the following four tasks: ≤ 3 of 5 points in the MMSE Seven backward test (attention); abnormal clock drawing test (executive dysfunction); subscore = 0 in the MMSE Pentagons (visuo-constructive ability); and ≤ 2 of 3 points in the 3-Word Recall of the MMSE (memory performance). A Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) score <10 was used to indicate the absence of severe depression. EPIPARK: Dementia was defined using operationalized level 1 MDS dementia criteria. These criteria required 1, a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score < 2127; 2, cognitive deficits severe enough to impact daily living (UPDRS sub-score I item 1, Intellectual impairment score ≥ 2 indicating ‘Dementia has impact on active daily living scale’); 3, impairment in at least two cognitive domains operationalized as impairment in two of the following four tasks: ≤ 2 of 3 points in the MoCA serial seven subtraction test; 0 points in the MoCA language fluency test item (language); ≤ 4 of 5 points in the word recall of the MoCA (delayed recall); ≤ 4 of 5 on the MoCA visuospatial/executive test. A Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score ≤30 was used to indicate the absence of severe depression. HBS: Dementia was defined using operationalized level 1 MDS dementia criteria. These criteria required 1, an MMSE < 26; 2, cognitive deficits severe enough to impact daily living (UPDRS sub-score I item 1, Intellectual impairment score ≥ 2 indicating ‘Dementia has impact on active daily living scale’); 3, impairment in at least two cognitive domains operationalized as impairment in two of the following four tasks: ≤ 3 of 5 points in the MMSE Seven backward test (attention); abnormal clock drawing test (executive dysfunction); subscore = 0 in the MMSE Pentagons (visuo-constructive ability); and ≤ 2 of 3 points in the 3-Word Recall of the MMSE (memory performance). A Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) score <10 was used to indicate the absence of severe depression.Show more404 individualsEuropean, NRDeNoPa, EPIPARK, HBS
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 rows